Multitasking is not good for you

May 22, 2010

I started planning for my impending trip to India. Since it is a trip after three years, one of the objectives is to stay in India as long as possible. I successfully planned to convert my vacation time of X days into X+Y days, Y being weekends. I will be off to enjoy my long vacation in few days.  So I thought. I found a blunder in my plan.  I failed to include a long weekend in the plan which could have made the trip even longer and better. Funny

I am not happy with myself. After being mad at myself, I started blamestorming to find reasons, excuses and scapegoats. I was so confident that it was not my fault. I searched really hard to find the reasons behind this blunder and could not find any. Finally, I turned attention to myself to understand what went wrong in the planning part. The findings may seem to have a weak connection to the outcome but they are true. Here is what I found.

The root causes of the mistake are Infomania and multitasking. In plain English, those two words mean “not paying attention to the task at hand”.

I have been trying to focus on too much information at once. Ultimately this led to a mental mistake. Infomaina is a term coined by Elizabeth M Ferrarini, author of “Confessions of an Infomaniac”. Infomania is the debilitating state of information overload. Studies by Dr. Glenn Wilson found that people who are distracted by email and phone calls experience a 10 point fall in the IQ. This drop is more than twice from the impact of smoking marijuana and sleep loss even though the effect of marijuana is longer lasting than the information overload.

I have misunderstood my switch-tasking ability to multi-tasking. A few days ago I was sending an email to start an important professional conversation. Being a self confessed multi-tasker, I was talking on the phone while sending the email. I did a fairly good job in framing the email. While hitting the “send” button, I saw a mistake in the email. I started the email with “Hell Mr. John”. It was too late. Switch-tasking reduces the efficiency by 40%.  Research by Professor Earl Miller, a neuroscientist at MIT indicates that a human brain can focus on one or two items at any point in time. So unless you are an expert juggler, you cannot multi-task.

While my mistake didn’t affect anybody negatively, it still worth noting the findings from above mentioned research are real. These research findings have even more significance in today’s world of Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and 24/7 texting.

Claudia Wallis wrote great post in Time about multi-tasking generation explaining what kids are losing by being “connected” all the time. Few weeks ago a trader misspelled “million” with “b” which almost sent the world economy into another recession. Probably, he was multi tasking.  Millions of people multitasking and not focusing on the task at hand could have been an indirect reason why we had a recent recession. If you are texting while driving, you are 23 times more likely to get into an accident, a recent study shows. See what could happen if you text while driving in this popular YouTube video. Be advised that the video has some gory details.

I plan to work on my habits. How about you?


Learning from Indian Premier League’s mistakes

April 28, 2010

What can we learn from this?

Indian Premier League is a franchise based cricket league in India. IPL, started in 2008 with a lot of fanfare, had hope for young cricketers, promise for businessmen and entertainment for fans. This league was modelled after English premier league and NBA. After 2 successful seasons, IPL ran into quite bit of controversy. Gone are the days when IPL was money printing, prime time entertainer. The league office has an ostrich-sized egg in its face. Speculations are rampant about bribery and illegal betting.

There are important lessons to be learned from IPL’s stumble. An organization’s growth should be organic. This should come with systematic planning and precise execution. Relentless pursuit of improvement and business development can bring success to an organization. Conversely, lack of attention to organization’s internal processes can have grave consequences.

IPL was built to take advantage of the religious following for cricket India. India played their first cricket match in 1932, but the game had to wait about 50 years to gain popularity. The game has been developed from the grass roots and turned into national passion. When India plays Pakistan in cricket, the entire nation stops and watches the intense drama. While IPL is a cricket league, the game is hard to be found. Opening ceremonies, Bollywood star sightings, IPL nights, and after parties took center stage while cricket became a side show. The high flying (ex-) commissioner along with his cohort generated unreal (really) evaluations for the league franchises through pure speculations and media propaganda. Currently IPL is valued at four billion dollars but no franchise is making money yet, even after three years.

IPL’s current woes are a reminder that developing a product and innovation it takes time. In order to expand variety, volume, and complexity and still maintain an edge in quality, you have to consistently develop and reinforce the processes and management skills of people throughout the organization. Systematic and quality processes are key to an organization’s well-being and sustainability. Last time I checked, cricket is still a popular game in India. It is the processes around that are falling apart and putting the people who are involved to shame. IPL commissioner, Mr. Modi tweeted his way out of the office. Nowadays he spends time tweeting IPL trivia. I guess it is time well spent. The longer he stays away from cricket the better it is for the game and the fans.

Board of control for cricket in India (BCCI) should start focusing more on the game than after parties and other circus activities. Renew the focus on running IPL with better processes and responsible people who work more than tweet. Improve the infrastructure to provide better development opportunities for cricket in India. Cricket is the primary and only product provided by IPL. League’s main focus is to maintain the integrity of this great game.

Fans owe it to themselves to ensure that they are not encouraging the narcissistic behavior of IPL management. It is the fan who controls what happens with the league. If the fans stop showing up to see the circus created by IPL until they get their act together and provide a better product, the game of cricket will live to see better days.


Spring colors

April 21, 2010

Spring is indeed beautiful ...

… spring time gives me the fresh feel with all the fresh green shades around and many other bright colorful flowers …. What do you say?


Can the game of Cricket survive?

March 28, 2010

I did not title this blog to be sarcastic. I wanted to draw your attention to the severity of the consequences of Indian Premier League’s (IPL) actions that will cause the eventual demise of the beautiful game of cricket.

IPL, a brain child of Lalit Modi, is a new money making, entertaining (supposedly, depends on who you talk to) brand new version of cricket. As a cricket fan I like to follow and support all forms of cricket. But I do have reservations to support IPL. In my opinion it is a travelling circus for which I thanked Mr. Modi last year.

Here is my last year’s post.

“A day after India crashed out of T20 world cup, it’s time to look back and appreciate a few performances and analyze what could have been better. As an avid (Indian) cricket fan it is hard to be objective in the thought process after a gut wrenching loss to a team which is yet to win a major event in their long cricketing history.

 

The team fought hard to save the pain for a billion cricket fans but fell short by 3 runs. We all have one man to thank for what has transpired to be a tough series which ended with a bit of chin music. England bowlers would not have dared to bowl those short balls if Sehwag suited up for the game. Dhoni concurs, asked if injured opener Virender Sehwag’s absence had an impact on India’s performance, Dhoni said: “He is the sort of player you can’t really replace – we missed him. When he starts off the bowler is under pressure. He’s a great player to have in your side.”

Mr. Modi can take the lion’s share of credit for Sehwag’s absence and Zaheer Khan’s fifty percent presence in the lineup. He has single handedly destroyed the dreams of billion fans and will continue to do that in the future. His thirst for power and money is unquenchable. He created a circus to entertain his motives and called himself a commissioner.

I am not trying to blame an injury or two for the team’s loss. I am trying to come to terms with the fact that those two injuries happened while playing in games which don’t matter to anybody and are already forgotten. This loss will linger in our minds for a long time, and it is quite painful.

I would like to thank Mr. Modi for saving my time by eliminating India from the world cup. I am sure corporate India will send him a few bouquets and gifts as millions of fans won’t call in sick for work after watching a late night game.

Thank you Mr. Modi, keep your ego-centric and narcissistic ideas coming and save us some time.”

First let’s examine the pros of this league.

  • A lot of young cricketers get a chance to showcase their skills and earn a living. Never before this was possible in Indian economy.
  • It takes only three hours to get a result. This is good for all of us who are in it for instant gratification. Enjoy while it lasts.
  • Opportunity to market the game outside the traditional venues.
  • I tried to come up with more benefits, sorry they don’t exist.

Having established the pros of IPL, let’s take a look at the drawbacks. I am a cricket fan, would like to see all formats (Test, One-Day and T20) of the game flourish. There seems to be a conflict of interest between IPL, which uses the three hour T20 format, and other traditional versions of the game. Fundamentals on which the IPL is being built are going to ruin the One-Day and Five-Day versions of the game and will inevitably erode cricket’s rich fabric.

I think IPL will fail for the following reasons.

  • IPL is going to fasten the demise of Indian domestic cricket, which is already lacking support. Australia produces more world class players because they have a strong domestic cricket structure. This could hurt Indian cricket’s sustainability at international level.
  • IPL franchise owners need to start making money sooner to get most out of their 10 year contract. This could be quite difficult in the short-term. According to some analyses, team owners may start getting some of their money back only after five years. Cricket Australia chief executive James Sutherland told Sydney radio station 2KY. “It’s nice to pay the players well and get big money from television rights and sponsorships, but ultimately you’ve got to provide a return for the owners.” Do you think the owners accept financial losses for five years and do nothing about it? I will get into the details of economics in a later post.
  • Franchises may start taking decisions on players behalf (after all they bought the players at an auction), which could put them at loggerheads with BCCI.
  • Revenue streams of Indian cricket may start running dry. Sahara group bought a franchise team spending 1700 crore Rupees (Approximately $378 million). According to Subrato Roy, Chairman of Sahara Group, they are emotionally attached to the game and now they are reconsidering their sponsorship deal with Team India because of their new purchase. Go figure.
  • Too much cricket could reduce the length of a player’s career.
  • Too much fatigue on players’ bodies hurts Indian cricket team’s performance at international level. Most of the fans remember India’s performance in 2009 edition of T20 world cup. Thanks to injuries sustained during 2009 IPL season, Sehwag and Zaheer were absent. Boy, did we feel their absence? We are already second guessing Dhoni and Gambhir’s chances of making it to 2010 T20 world cup.

Let’s hope the winning ways will be back again.



What do you think?


How many friends can you handle?

March 17, 2010

How many friends can you handle? Before you sign into your facebook, Myspace or Orkut accounts and start counting, take a minute to think about what friendship is all about.

All of us have friends and quite a few of them actually. Everyone enjoys this relationship in many ways. Even the 145 million orphans in this world find solace in friendship. This relationship may be the most important influence in human lives. Somebody once said, “Humans make decisions, those decisions define humans.” We do consult with friends while making important decisions in life. We share happiness with our parents, problems with mentors, gifts with significant others and achievements with everybody. But we share everything including joy, sorrow and any other emotions or expressions with good friends.

Is there a limit to the number of friends one can have? Oxford professor of evolutionary anthropology, Robin Dunbar in his research suggests that if you are friends with over 150 people, the extras are meaningless. The study also found that there is a negative relationship between emotional closeness and network size. What is your take on this conclusion?  This research was a talking point in a recent post on Fast Company. These findings may affect the business decisions regarding the addition of new features and other promotions by the social networking companies. Do these conclusions seem valid when you look at the kinds of interactions with “friends” in your network? Were you happy when there were fewer friends in your network?

Average user has 130 friends on Facebook. In general each individual communicates with close friends (one or two) on a weekly basis and less often with the rest. Interaction with rest of the “friends” tends to happen due to a need or pure accident. Yes, there are some exceptions to this observation but holds true in case of general population. Facebook may need to change the usage of the word “friend” to acquaintance or connection.

I do see the thought process behind Professor’s Dunbar’s research and findings, but I am happy to have as many friends as I do and like to have more. What about you?


on a Quest!!!

March 15, 2010

Everyone likes to have many different things (or achieve) in their life, and not everyone succeeds. Start your quest and work for it…instead of just having a desire/wish.


Are you a Polymath?

March 2, 2010

Many ancient scientists such as Pythagorus and Archimedes were interested in many subjects. Their curiosity gave us the concepts we study today. Leonardo Davinci was not a scientist; he was a curious human being. He didn’t try to find things. He tried to pursue his passion for learning. While doing that he came across some findings which we call them the greatest inventions. He was good at painting, sculpting, architecture, music, science, mathematics, engineering, anatomy, geology, and botany. He was known as a Polymath, a person whose knowledge and expertise spans a significant number of subject areas.

In today’s society, we are taught to focus on one subject throughout college and a career that follows. Even though we are not restricted to do that,  most of us end up with knowledge or expertise in one area and continue to work in that area for the rest of our lives. I think this kills innovation. In most cases innovation comes from need and exposure to a lot of concepts not limited to any one particular area. The latest invention Bloom Energy came out of the knowledge in concepts (but not limited to) such as Fuel cell technology and Material science.

Should we redefine our education system? Share your thoughts.


Ascent to the Brighter side…

February 25, 2010

Ascending stairs leading to the brighter side of life

Step by step we work hard to lead us and our dear for a brighter life…


My Questions

February 23, 2010

Here are some questions I am trying to find answers for. I have had multiple conversations with a lot of intelligent people regarding these. While the conversations were very constructive, I still found myself without a convincing answer.

  1. How to identify your passion?
  2. How to take risks?
  3. How to make friends?
  4. How to deal with your problems?
  5. How to become successful?

Biographies of popular and successful people offer a lot of feel good stories and some are even made into movies. They give a good account of situations that worked and didn’t work for the characters in the story. Of all the people (approximately 1000,000,000,000) who has ever lived on this planet, no single case study came out that could be used as a blue print for all situations in life.

I think every situation is unique and there are no set frameworks that can be used for each situation. Ultimately, we are responsible for who we are, what we do and where we are. If you are not happy about the situation do something about it. Sit down, decide where you want to go or what you want to do, and figure out how to get there step-by-step. It is that simple!

What are some of the questions you are trying to get an answer for? Please share your thoughts.


Harvard Business Review blog on Networking

February 19, 2010

I came across this blog in Harvard busness review on how to use Networking. While I understand author’s position on building networks, have reservations on the process being focussed on the ultimate goal of getting something out of it. I would still subscribe to the fact that our social behaviour should take care of our “Networks”. “Netoworking” as it stands today, sounds like a lot of work we are doing for selfish reasons. How about making friends and being useful to each other. Let’s not create a process to make and keep friends.

Link to the blog on Harvard Business Review: http://blogs.hbr.org/hmu/2010/02/how-to-make-your-network-work.html

My previous post on networking: Don’t “Network”!